Alison Pilkington

Alison Pilkington  graduated with a BA Hons Fine Art Painting from National College Art & Design in 1990. She completed an MA in film and TV studies in Dublin City University in 1994.  She is currently undertaking PhD research in Painting at National College Art & Design Dublin.

Her work has been selected for group shows in Ireland, Scotland, England and America, and she has had solo exhibitions in Belltable Arts Centre Limerick, Sligo Art Gallery, Basement Gallery Dundalk, The Workroom Dublin,  & Kevin Kavanagh Dublin.  Her work is in numerous public and private collections including OPW, Univeristy College Dublin & Bank of Ireland.

She has received arts council travel and publication awards and project bursaries. She is co – editor of The Fold with fellow artist Cora Cummins which is a publishing platform for invited artists to consider various themes.

“Unfamilar terrain – Painting the Uncanny”

My practice-based research uses the uncanny as a frameworking device to investigate looking through painting as a specific experience, whilst undertaking a  continuous critique of the material, activity and experience of painting

I propose that painting  has always been engaged in a discussion  with an experience of the uncanny, often in implicit ways. I argue that painting, as a subject, as an action and an apparatus  is inherently uncanny and I propose to explore this instrinic uncanny-ness of painting through the making of paintings and through an analysis of  specific paintings.

I am exploring if the form of painting can add something to the knowledge of the uncanny. There has been much research  into the uncanny in literature, film studies and in the visual arts through film, photography, sound and through notions of embodiment and bodies, but very little research  through painting as a specific experience.

I make no empirical claims  instead I argue that the uncanny is best understood through poetic and fictitious means which perhaps, makes painting a most appropriate medium to try to understand it.

Much of the work I have produced is site specific and invites the viewer to consider both the pictorial space of paintings and the actual space of  the encounter with the work as entry points into an experience of the uncanny.

 A Painter’s Progress

“I recently came across a painting of a woman’s face in a newspaper that was strangely voided or blacked out. I recognized it as a detail from Pietro Longhi’s  The rhinoceros also known as Clara the rhinoceros (1751). It is an intriguing  painting which hangs in the National Gallery in London. Coincidentally I happened to be in London and spent some time in the National Gallery studying the painting and trying to explore  why I find this particular painting uncanny. The detail of the painting is strange in itself but I find the entire painting uncanny. I propose that there is an unexpected and unintentional uncanny-ness in Clara  that emerges through the formal elements of the painting combined with its subject matter.

 As a genre painter Longhi depicts contemporary life in Venice in the mid-eighteenth century. He often painted people during carnival in Venice where the public display of masks was part of the ritual to hide one’s identity. Longhi made this painting to show the sense of awe and wonder at a strange animal shown to the public , an animal that they would never have seen before. As contemporary viewers we understand why he has done this painting, to show something wondrous, but we no longer share that sense of wonder, we no longer gasp in awe because we are familiar with that sight. What we don’t understand so much is why the woman’s face is blacked out and what this, if anything, has to do with the rhinoceros. I don’t believe that the uncanny has arisen from either motif in themselves. I propose that there is something in the juxta-positioning of these two elements; the rhinoceros and the voided face of the woman that creates a strange unsettling feeling.

Albrech Durer’s earlier drawing and subsequent woodcut of a rhinoceros is strange but not for me, uncanny. Similarly other paintings of Longhi’s which depict masked women don’t have the same uncanny charge. So what is it about the composition that is strange?

 Firstly, the classical triangular composition places the masked woman right at the pinnacle of the pyramid , like a fairy on a Christmas tree. Secondly her blacked out face is the focal point rather than the rhinoceros itself, she is picked out at the point of the highest tonal contrast in the painting, the black of her face and whiteness of her skin and then of her  dress. At this centre then is a black, a nothingness that the eyes float in. It is not that her face is masked so much as it appears to be deleted .  This empty-ness has an uncanny anachronistic feeling for an eighteenth century painting.  It doesn’t seem to ‘fit’ with the style of what one expects in a painting of this genre. The unexpected void looks either primitive or contemporary postmodern. The eyes that float in the void equally seem either primitive or contemporary.

 Is there something unsaid in her gaze that seems relevant now to us the contemporary viewer?  Is she speaking across the centuries directly to us, telling us something that might be relevant to us?

  Is she a harbinger?

Does she foretell something of death?

 Unlike the other figures in the painting who tell us something of life in eighteenth century Venice, does she speak more of the commonality of death? She appears to float above the scene, she doesn’t interact with the scene but stares out from it.

Her eyes connect with me in a way the other eyes that look from the scene don’t. It is strangely inexplicable.

The compelling thing for me about this picture is how the uncanny has changed focus over the centuries. What was strange then for viewers, the sight of the rhinoceros, is no longer strange now. The strangeness comes from the empty mask and the eyes that seem to echo the lines of Clarence in Shakespeare’s Richard III  “What ugly sights of death within mine eyes!”

Above all, she seems  to be very ‘other worldly’. She hovers in a symbolic space as well as literal space whereas the rhinoceros seems very much of this world, residing in a pit with her own excrement, she appears visceral and ‘real’.

Reader, is it not the unintentional uncanny that occurs in this painting that is most compelling or affecting?”

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s